home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- <text id=90TT2638>
- <title>
- Oct. 08, 1990: Knowing When To Duck
- </title>
- <history>
- TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1990
- Oct. 08, 1990 Do We Care About Our Kids?
- </history>
- <article>
- <source>Time Magazine</source>
- <hdr>
- THE GULF, Page 28
- Knowing When to Duck
- </hdr>
- <body>
- <p> The question concerned accountability, and James Baker
- would have none of it. In a television interview last week, the
- Secretary of State was pointedly asked by New York Times
- reporter R.W. Apple Jr. why the U.S. ambassador to Iraq, on
- Baker's direct orders, told Saddam Hussein in late July that the
- U.S. took no position on Iraq's border and economic dispute with
- Kuwait. A week later, Iraq invaded the emirate.
- </p>
- <p> Baker said he agreed with a Washington Post columnist who
- had called such questions "retrospective scapegoating" and
- "shameful." He added, "We've got some 20/20 hindsight going on
- that's been highly critical, frankly, of some very fine career
- public servants," meaning Ambassador April Glaspie and John
- Kelly, the Assistant Secretary of State for Near Eastern and
- South Asian affairs. The criticism, replied Apple, was not aimed
- at the diplomats. "They're trying to criticize you."
- </p>
- <p> The reporter was on target. But rather than accept
- responsibility for the Administration's initially conciliatory
- policy toward Baghdad, Baker attempted an unseemly dodge. "You
- want me to say those instructions were sent specifically by me
- on my specific orders," said Baker. "There are probably 312,000
- cables or so that go out under my name as Secretary of State."
- </p>
- <p> Baker may be right in branding suggestions that the U.S.
- somehow encouraged Baghdad's aggression "absolutely ludicrous."
- But the incident revealed anew that taking blame as well as
- credit is not Baker's style. The trait predates his 20 months at
- the State Department. During the 1988 presidential campaign,
- Baker labored to keep his fingerprints off the controversial
- Willie Horton ads, although as campaign manager he was
- ultimately responsible for their repeated airing. When Bush
- selected the callow Dan Quayle as his running mate, Baker
- distanced himself from the choice. When the U.S. invaded Panama
- last December, Baker was scarcely to be seen. When the
- Administration was accused of appeasing China after the Beijing
- massacre, Baker lied publicly about secretive U.S. contacts
- between high-level Chinese officials and National Security
- Adviser Brent Scowcroft. In sharp contrast, George Bush, who
- never ducks, took the criticism for his own policy.
- </p>
- <p> No one is calling for Baker's resignation, nor should they.
- For the most part, he has worked tirelessly and performed well
- at a complex juncture in foreign affairs. In fact, Baker did not
- have his eye on the mounting dangers in the Persian Gulf because
- he was preoccupied with the collapse of the Soviet empire and
- German unification. Nonetheless, Baker's tendency to dissociate
- himself from policies that fare poorly is a pattern that
- increasingly disturbs less agile associates. "When it hits the
- fan," said a Foggy Bottom veteran, "he's in the shower."
- </p>
- <p>By Christopher Ogden/Washington.
- </p>
-
- </body>
- </article>
- </text>
-
-